Neurology Training and Medical Education in Resource-Limited Settings: Building and Growing the First Neurology Residency Program in East Africa.

The burden of neurological disease disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, where the lowest number of neurologists are located. Building local training opportunities in resource-limited settings is a foundational step to enhancing the neurological workforce and improving access to neurological care in these regions. In this article, we describe the development and growth of the first neurology residency program in East Africa, which was established in 2006 at Zewditu Memorial Hospital and the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. We highlight the impact of the program on clinical care, research, collaborations between neurologists across Ethiopia, and ways to build educational opportunities and mentorship while faced with limited resources. The main challenges in starting the residency program included lack of faculty with neurological expertise, lack of a precedent for subspecialty training in our setting, as well as limited resources and space. The formation of sustainable international collaborations with clinicians at established institutions in high-income countries and neurological societies has been a major source of support in developing the initial infrastructure, curriculum and educational content, knowledge assessments, and mentored research projects. Local partnerships with related medical specialties, including internal medicine, critical care, neurological surgery, and psychiatry, were also instrumental in creating training opportunities. As the program continues to evolve, many challenges remain, including limited diagnostics, lack of access to advanced treatment modalities, lack of fellowship training opportunities in various neurological subspecialties, and insufficient training and experience in scientific writing. Despite these challenges, the residency program has persevered and its creation resulted in many positive changes: since its inception in 2006, we graduated 80 neurologists and the number of practicing neurologists in Ethiopia has increased from 5 to 78, our institution has evolved into a national referral center for neurology, graduates have published 61 articles in the past 3 years and contributed to international neurology research, and alumni of the program have grown the Association of Ethiopian Neurologists. Future directions include development of fellowship opportunities, creation of international rotations, and implementation of teleneurology to further strengthen neurological care across Ethiopia.

Needs assessment for direct ophthalmoscopy training in neurology residency.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the ocular fundus, traditionally by direct ophthalmoscopy (DO), is essential to evaluate many neurologic diseases. However, the status of DO training in neurology residencies is unknown. We conducted a needs assessment to determine current attitudes, curricula, and gaps in DO training. METHODS: A survey was developed and administered to residents and program directors (PDs) at ACGME accredited neurology residencies in the United States. The survey assessed factors such as current DO curricula, perceived importance of DO, confidence of skills, and need for improvement. Data analysis was performed using the Mann Whitney U test and Fisher Exact Test. RESULTS: Nineteen PDs (11.6%) and 74 (41.1%) residents responded to the survey. 97.1% of residents and 100.0% of PDs believe DO is an important skill to learn. 29.4% of PDs expected graduating residents to have completed > 10 supervised DO exams, while 0.0% of graduating fourth year residents reported doing so (p = 0.03). 35.7% of graduating residents had never correctly identified an abnormal finding on DO. The number of times residents practiced DO unsupervised correlated with increasing confidence in all components of the DO exam (p < 0.05). Residents who felt their program emphasized DO were more likely to perform DO at least once a week compared to residents who did not perceive program emphasis (61.9% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.02) and were more confident in DO (p < 0.05). 66.7% of residents and 42.1% of PDs were not satisfied with current levels of DO training. 96.7% of residents and 78.9% of PDs felt it was important to improve curriculum for DO training. Supervised practice and practice skills sessions were identified as the most helpful interventions to improve DO training. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of neurology PDs and residents believe DO is an important skill to learn, are unsatisfied with the current level of DO training, and advocate for improvement in DO curricula. Current DO curricula have limited formal didactic training and supervised practice. The bulk of DO learning occurs through unsupervised practice, which is influenced by motivational factors such as perceived residency emphasis on DO learning.

Opinion & Special Article: Community Approach Toward Inclusion of Sex and Gender Diversity in Graduate Neurology Education.

Sex and gender diverse (SGD) neurology trainees include transgender, nonbinary, and intersex people. There has been historical exclusion of SGD trainees from participating in clinical care, medical research, and academic training programs. Therefore, neurology educators have unique opportunities to support SGD trainees and colleagues, but may lack the education to appropriately do so. Training programs and professional organizations can collaborate to create safe pathways for SGD trainees to disclose their identities in professional settings. Referral to community support and resources is important for SGD trainees considering professional disclosure. Educators should address the challenges and discrimination unique to SGD graduate trainees in neurology, such as lack of inclusion, affirming environments, supportive policies, and medical accommodations. Faculty training on sensitivity, bias, and bystander effects should be ongoing among institutions. Topics regarding sex and gender diversity are lacking in graduate medical education. Educational curricula often use outdated terminology or binary paradigms to teach about sex and gender. Health care training inequities may cause downstream harm to SGD patients; therefore, training curricula that are reflective of an accurate and affirming understanding of sex and gender may mitigate the potential for inequities. This article provides recommendations to support SGD neurology trainees and to incorporate specific training on sex and gender diversity in academic neurology curricula. Such support is critical to the career success and development of SGD neurology trainees.

Online Core Curriculum and Mastery (OCCAM): A Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry (BNNP) Curricular Needs Assessment.

Behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry (BNNP) fellowships are accredited by the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS). Programs cover the UCNS-recommended topics differently. A curriculum accessible to all fellowships would standardize education and identify gaps in topics that are less well covered across programs. The purpose of the present needs assessment was to inform the development of the Online Core Curriculum and Mastery: BNNP (OCCAM-BNNP), a website for all UCNS-accredited BNNP programs. Program directors and fellows were surveyed to learn how well topics are covered and identify educational gaps, or specific topics on the UCNS website that are less well represented among programs. Thirty-seven fellowship program directors listed on the UCNS website were invited to take the survey and forward it to both current fellows (graduating in 2021) and recent graduates (graduated from 2015 to 2020). There were 29 responses from 37 programs. Of the 34 topics that respondents rated on a 1-5 Likert scale (from "not covered" to "completely covered"), 15 of 34 (44%) were identified as having >40% of responses as mostly "not covered," "incompletely covered," or "partially covered." Ninety-seven percent of respondents affirmed that it would be useful to have a free web-based resource for BNNP education. Slightly under one-half of all BNNP topics were not well covered. A survey was undertaken to identify and fill the educational gaps indicated by fellowship directors and fellows, and the OCCAM-BNNP website was developed as a repository for relevant content, providing a resource that many BNNP clinicians would find useful.

Dual Residency Training in Neurology and Psychiatry: History and Current Practice.

In the early 20th century, neurology training included more experience in psychiatry, and psychiatry training included more training in neurology than what is currently required. After World War I, the increased need for differential diagnosis of what might now be called functional neurological disorders resulted in the military encouraging combined residency training in neurology and psychiatry and the promulgation of the term "neuropsychiatry" for this specialty. Thirty-six percent of physicians certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology in its first decade (1935-1945) held certification in both neurology and psychiatry. However, the term neuropsychiatry gradually became used interchangeably with general psychiatry-to distinguish it from psychoanalysis-and lost its specificity. It is widely held that the popularity of psychoanalysis resulted in psychiatrists perceiving less need for neurological knowledge, and inclusion of neurology content in psychiatry training decreased. Dual residency training programs in neurology and psychiatry began to increase in popularity again in the 1980s as advances in neuroscience, neuroimaging, and pharmacology, paired with the growth of behavioral neurology, laid the foundation for meaningful practice of neuropsychiatry. The author surveyed 207 physicians who graduated from both a neurology and psychiatry residency and 18 current trainees in combined neuropsychiatry residency programs to collect information on their current practice, academic activity, and opinions about their training. The response rate was 64%. Respondents' attitudes toward the value of their dual neurology and psychiatry training were overwhelmingly positive. Reasons for the lack of growth of combined residency programs in neurology and psychiatry are examined.

The COVID-19 pandemic and neurology: A survey on previous and continued restrictions for clinical practice, curricular training, and health economics.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted health systems worldwide. Here, we assessed the pandemic's impact on clinical service, curricular training, and financial burden from a neurological viewpoint during the enforced lockdown periods and the assumed recovery by 2023. METHODS: An online 18-item survey was conducted by the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) NeuroCOVID-19 Task Force among the EAN community. The survey was online between February and March 2023. Questions related to general, demographic, clinical, work, education, and economic aspects. RESULTS: We collected 430 responses from 79 countries. Most health care professionals were aged 35-44 years, with >15 years of work experience. The key findings of their observations were as follows. (i) Clinical services were cut back in all neurological subspecialties during the most restrictive COVID-19 lockdown period. The most affected neurological subspecialties were services for patients with dementia, and neuromuscular and movement disorders. The levels of reduction and the pace of recovery were distinct for acute emergencies and in- and outpatient care. Recovery was slow for sleep medicine, autonomic nervous system disorders, neurorehabilitation, and dementia care. (ii) Student and residency rotations and grand rounds were reorganized, and congresses were converted into a virtual format. Conferences are partly maintained in a hybrid format. (iii) Affordability of neurological care and medication shortage are emerging issues. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of neurological services up to spring 2023 has been incomplete following substantial disruption of neurological care, medical education, and health economics in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The continued limitations for the delivery of neurological care threaten brain health and call for action on a global scale.

Neurophobia Among Medical Students: Is Virtual Teaching the Answer?

OBJECTIVE: Neurophobia is well recognized as dissuading medical students from neurocentric specialties and limiting the success of neurology and neurosurgery teaching at medical school. Past studies have associated neurophobia with deficiencies in medical education. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of medical students' confidence and perceived level of knowledge in recognizing the following neurosurgical and neurological emergencies: ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, status epilepticus, subarachnoid hemorrhage, increased intracranial pressure, acute hydrocephalus, spinal cord injury, cauda equina syndrome, and traumatic brain injury. In addition, we assessed the usefulness of virtual seminars in neurosurgery and neurology teaching. METHODS: Medical students from King's College London were invited to a virtual teaching session. We obtained preteaching and postteaching scores for students' subjective ability to recognize specific neurologic and neurosurgical emergencies, along with their confidence in the subject. RESULTS: Ninety-seven medical students attended the teaching session. For our sample group's subjective rating on their confidence in neurology or neurosurgery as a subject, we obtained a mean score of 3.87 and a median score of 4. Across all domains, there was a significant forward shift in the distribution curve of scores after teaching. We obtained statistically significant differences for all 9 neurologic and neurosurgical emergencies evaluated in our questionnaire (asymptotic significance <0.001). Median scores for all 9 conditions improved after the teaching session, with >50% positive ranks seen within each group. Across the teaching modalities compared, placement teaching was the highest scoring, whereas online lectures received a better rating than in-person lectures. CONCLUSIONS: In neurosurgery teaching, virtual seminars may compensate for deficiencies that exist within medical education, hence limiting the effects of neurophobia.

The 2022 European postgraduate (residency) programme in neurology in a historical and international perspective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurology residency programmes, which were first established at the beginning of the 20th century, have become mandatory all over Europe in the last 40-50 years. The first European Training Requirements in Neurology (ETRN) were published in 2005 and first updated in 2016. This paper reports the most recent revisions of the ETRN. METHODS: Members of the EAN board performed an in depth revision of the ETNR 2016-version, which was reviewed by members of the European Board and Section of Neurology of the UEMS, the Education and Scientific Panels, the Resident and Research Fellow Section and the Board of the EAN, as well as the presidents of the 47 European National Societies. RESULTS: The new (2022) ETRN suggest a 5-year training subdivided in three phases: a first phase (2 years) of general neurology training, a second phase (2 years) of training in neurophysiology/neurological subspecialties and a third phase (1 year) to expand clinical training (e.g., in other neurodisciplines) or for research (path for clinical neuroscientist). The necessary theoretical and clinical competences as well as learning objectives in diagnostic tests have been updated, are newly organized in four levels and include 19 neurological subspecialties. Finally, the new ETRN require, in addition to a programme director, a team of clinician-educators who regularly review the resident's progress. The 2022 update of the ETRN reflects emerging requirements for the practice of neurology and contributes to the international standardization of training necessary for the increasing needs of residents and specialists across Europe.

Impact of an Interactive, Animation-Based Electroencephalography Curriculum on Learner Confidence and Knowledge.

BACKGROUND: There is a national need for innovative electroencephalography (EEG) education with efficacy evaluated by rigorous statistical analysis. We created a dynamic, online resource that includes a series of animated videos at a single academic medical center. METHODS: For the animations and interactive module, we used VideoScribe and Articulate, respectively. The module comprised three chapters: (1) Origin & Technical Aspects of EEG, (2) Normal Adult EEG in Wakefulness & Sleep, and (3) Abnormal EEG, with appendices on artifacts, variants, activation procedures, seizure/epilepsy classification, and neonatal/pediatric EEG. The curriculum and knowledge assessments were reviewed independently by two fellowship-trained physicians before distribution. Linear mixed-effects models with bootstrapping were used to compare paired pre- and post-tests as well as Likert scale questionnaires. RESULTS: Forty-nine learners participated in the pretest survey; 38 matched participants completed post-tests (78%). Learners across fields perceived benefit (100% would recommend to colleagues), indicated improved self-efficacy (P < 0.0001), and performed better on post-test knowledge assessments (54.1 vs 88.2%, P < 0.0001). In the neurology providers subgroup (n = 20), pretest scores correlated with years in training (Spearman r = 0.52, P = 0.039), neurology rotations (r = 0.70, P = 0.003), epilepsy/EEG rotations (r = 0.6, P = 0.014), and EEG teaching hours (r = 0.62, P = 0.01); content knowledge and self-efficacy improvement for neurology providers remained significant in a multivariate model adjusting for these covariates. CONCLUSIONS: This animation-based, interactive EEG module proved effective in elevating learner confidence and knowledge across several medical specialties and training levels. Further study across institutions and subspecialties is needed to substantiate broad applicability, but our data appear promising for early EEG learners.

Neurophobia among resident physicians in the emergency service. / Neurofobia entre médicos residentes en los servicios de urgencias.

INTRODUCTION: Neurophobia is defined as the fear towards clinical neurology caused by the inability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical clinical situations. This phenomenon is not restricted to medical students and has never been studied before in the Emergency Department. We aimed to study how resident doctors perceive their knowledge in neurology and urgent neurological conditions as well as possible causes for said fears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional multicentric study using self-administered surveys sent to medical residents within the Aragon Health Service. They were questioned about their fear of neurology and other medical specialties, possible causes, and perception of knowledge in neurological pathologies and subareas in the emergency service. RESULTS: We obtained 134 responses. 27.6% (37) suffered from neurophobia. Despite neurology being considered the most difficult discipline, it did also arouse the third most interest among the students. The areas where they showed the most confidence were headaches and vascular pathology. The areas where they felt the most insecure were neuromuscular diseases, neuro-ophthalmology, and spinal cord injury. In none of the areas surveyed, the percentage of respondents who felt secure exceeded 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Neurophobia is prevalent among trainee doctors working in the emergency department. Their confidence correlates with the degree of exposure to patients. Neurologist must play an active role in the education of new specialist and promote the collaboration with emergency departments.

TITLE: Neurofobia entre médicos residentes en los servicios de urgencias.Introducción. La neurofobia se define como el miedo hacia la neurología que surge de la incapacidad para aplicar los conocimientos teóricos a situaciones clínicas prácticas. Este fenómeno parece no limitarse únicamente a estudiantes de medicina, pero no se dispone de estudios previos en el ámbito de urgencias. Este trabajo valora la percepción de conocimientos en las distintas patologías neurológicas urgentes por parte de médicos en formación y posibles motivos de neurofobia. Material y métodos. Se trata de un estudio transversal multicéntrico mediante encuestas autoadministradas a médicos en formación de todo el Servicio Aragonés de Salud. Se interrogó sobre su miedo a la neurología y otras especialidades médicas, posibles causas y percepción de conocimientos en patologías neurológicas en el servicio de urgencias. Resultados. Se obtuvieron 134 respuestas. El 27,6% (37) sufría neurofobia. La neurología fue la tercera disciplina que mayor interés despertó, pero se considera la de mayor dificultad. Las áreas en las que mayor seguridad mostraron fueron las cefaleas y la patología vascular. Donde mayor inseguridad existía fue en la neuromuscular, la neurooftalmología y la lesión medular aguda. En ninguna de las áreas hubo un porcentaje mayor del 50% que se sintiera seguro o muy seguro. Conclusiones. La neurofobia está presente entre los médicos en formación que desempeñan su labor en los servicios de urgencias. Su distribución depende del grado de exposición a los pacientes. Los neurólogos debemos desempeñar un papel activo en la formación de nuevos especialistas y promover la colaboración con los servicios de urgencias.

Neurofobia entre médicos residentes en los servicios de urgencias / Neurophobia among resident physicians in the emergency service

Introducción La neurofobia se define como el miedo hacia la neurología que surge de la incapacidad para aplicar los conocimientos teóricos a situaciones clínicas prácticas. Este fenómeno parece no limitarse únicamente a estudiantes de medicina, pero no se dispone de estudios previos en el ámbito de urgencias. Este trabajo valora la percepción de conocimientos en las distintas patologías neurológicas urgentes por parte de médicos en formación y posibles motivos de neurofobia. Material y métodos. Se trata de un estudio transversal multicéntrico mediante encuestas autoadministradas a médicos en formación de todo el Servicio Aragonés de Salud. Se interrogó sobre su miedo a la neurología y otras especialidades médicas, posibles causas y percepción de conocimientos en patologías neurológicas en el servicio de urgencias. Resultados Se obtuvieron 134 respuestas. El 27,6% (37) sufría neurofobia. La neurología fue la tercera disciplina que mayor interés despertó, pero se considera la de mayor dificultad. Las áreas en las que mayor seguridad mostraron fueron las cefaleas y la patología vascular. Donde mayor inseguridad existía fue en la neuromuscular, la neurooftalmología y la lesión medular aguda. En ninguna de las áreas hubo un porcentaje mayor del 50% que se sintiera seguro o muy seguro. Conclusiones La neurofobia está presente entre los médicos en formación que desempeñan su labor en los servicios de urgencias. Su distribución depende del grado de exposición a los pacientes. Los neurólogos debemos desempeñar un papel activo en la formación de nuevos especialistas y promover la colaboración con los servicios de urgencias. (AU)

INTRODUCTION Neurophobia is defined as the fear towards clinical neurology caused by the inability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical clinical situations. This phenomenon is not restricted to medical students and has never been studied before in the Emergency Department. We aimed to study how resident doctors perceive their knowledge in neurology and urgent neurological conditions as well as possible causes for said fears. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cross-sectional multicentric study using self-administered surveys sent to medical residents within the Aragon Health Service. They were questioned about their fear of neurology and other medical specialties, possible causes, and perception of knowledge in neurological pathologies and subareas in the emergency service. RESULTS We obtained 134 responses. 27.6% (37) suffered from neurophobia. Despite neurology being considered the most difficult discipline, it did also arouse the third most interest among the students. The areas where they showed the most confidence were headaches and vascular pathology. The areas where they felt the most insecure were neuromuscular diseases, neuro-ophthalmology, and spinal cord injury. In none of the areas surveyed, the percentage of respondents who felt secure exceeded 50%. CONCLUSIONS Neurophobia is prevalent among trainee doctors working in the emergency department. Their confidence correlates with the degree of exposure to patients. Neurologist must play an active role in the education of new specialist and promote the collaboration with emergency departments. (AU)

Neurophobia among medical students and resident trainees in a tertiary comprehensive hospital in China.

BACKGROUND: Medical students and residents have been revealed to have extraordinary difficulties in managing patients with neurological complaints. However, specific information on Chinese trainees is scarce. Herein, we aimed to uncover the presence of, contributing factors for, and potential solutions to neurophobia among medical students and resident trainees in China. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered to the medical students of Peking Union Medical College and residents of the Internal Medicine Residency Training Program at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. We asked about perceived difficulty, knowledge, interest, and confidence in neurology in contrast to six other specialties. The reasons why neurology is regarded as difficult and approaches for improving neurological teaching have been appraised. RESULTS: A total of 351 surveys were completed by 218 medical students and 133 residents. The response rate exceeded 70% in both groups. The prevalence of neurophobia was 66.1% and 58.6% among medical students and residents, respectively. Respondents declared that greater difficulty was observed in neurology than in other specialties, and the management of patients with neurological problems was the least comfortable (p < 0.0001). Neurophobia has various perceived causes, and neuroanatomy is regarded as the most important contributor. Nearly 80% of medical students felt that improvements in neurology teaching could be achieved through further integration of preclinical and clinical neurological teaching. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the first survey on neurophobia in China are in accordance with those of previous studies. Neurophobia is highly prevalent in Chinese medical students and residents. Strategies to improve teaching, including enhanced integration of teaching and more online resources, are needed to prevent neurophobia.

Advancing the Field of Fetal Neurology: A Call for Global Collaborations.

Fetal Neurology continues to grow as a distinct subspecialty informed by evolving precision diagnosis with advancements in prenatal neuroimaging, genetic and infectious testing. While there are inherent limitations and challenges in prenatal diagnostic testing and prognostic counseling, the interdisciplinary approach allows comprehensive guidance for perinatal and postnatal management of neurological disorders detected early in development. The current practice of fetal neurology is heterogenous and variable across centers. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), fetal neurology practice is under the umbrella of neonatal and perinatal medicine. Since infrastructure and capacity for prenatal diagnostic and prognostic counseling may be variable, the practice approach may have to be modified regionally based on resources, education, and setting. There is a need for collaborative development of educational opportunities, training, guidelines, and research exploring short- and long-term outcome of prenatally identified neurological conditions. Interdisciplinary collaborations and global professional networks are crucial to advance this unique subspecialty.

Developing a Curriculum for Functional Neurological Disorder in Neurology Training: Questions and Answers.

Functional neurologic disorder (FND) is a common condition for which neurology residents often receive little to no formal teaching. Using a question-and-answer format, this article puts forward a case for why an FND curriculum is needed and aims to provide guidance on possible curricular content including medical knowledge, clinical skills, communication, and team-based collaboration. The authors also discuss methods for teaching and evaluating this knowledge and associated clinical skills, linking this to current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education neurology milestones. Finally, the authors consider how to better engage and energize neurology trainees around this underserved yet challenging patient population.

Recognizing and Responding to the Needs of Future Child and Adult Neurology Care Through the Evolution of Residency Training.

Recent insights into the frequency of occurrence and the genetic and mechanistic basis of nervous system disease have demonstrated that neurologic disorders occur as a spectrum across all ages. To meet future needs of patients with neurologic disease of all ages and prepare for increasing implementaton of precision therapies, greater integration of child and adult neurology residency training is needed. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:1005-1007.

Emerging Subspecialties in Neurology: Interventional Neurology: A Starter Guide for Neurology Residents.

Interventional neurology is a subspecialty at the cross-section of neurology, neurosurgery, and neuroradiology that uses image-guided endovascular catheter techniques to diagnose and treat neurovascular disorders. Although interventional neurology techniques have existed for decades, recent landmark trials in stroke thrombectomy have catalyzed dramatic changes to the interventional neurology field, and there is rising neurology interest and representation. Unlike other neurology subspecialties, however, interventional neurology training and fellowship applications are not standardized. Thus, it can be difficult for neurology trainees to navigate this rapidly changing and multidisciplinary field. This article seeks to provide neurology residents and residency program directors with a brief overview of the modern interventional neurology field, the current fellowship application process, and tips on how neurologists can best prepare for a career in interventional neurology. To this end, we conducted a nationwide survey of interventional neurology fellowship program directors regarding training neurologists. We distill survey responses into concrete, actionable items for neurology trainees.